Question Details

[answered] 11/10/2016 Assessment 2 - PHIFP2000 Summer 2016 Section 02

I need a 4-6 page paper in which you address a complex ethical dilemma applying various ethical theories to this problem. Philosophical reasoning about human conduct aims first to discover a clear difference between right and wrong and then apply this distinction to specific situations. I have included detailed instructions as well as references that you MUST use throughout this paper. This must be APA format with a reference (works cited page)?

11/10/2016 Assessment 2 ? PHI?FP2000 ? Summer 2016 ? Section 02 ASSESSMENT 2


Making A Moral Decision Overview Write 4?6 pages in which you invent a practical circumstance that illuminates differences between the


three approaches to normative theory.


There may be times in life where doing your duty might cause lasting harm or where caring about


people requires breaking the rules.


By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following


course competencies and assessment criteria:


Competency 1: Explain the nature of ethical issues.


Describe a concrete situation that calls for making an ethical decision.


Competency 2: Critically examine the contributions of key thinkers from the history of ethics.


Apply traditional theories of normative ethics to a concrete situation.


Competency 3: Engage in ethical debate.


Describe the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to ethical theory.


Competency 4: Develop a position on a contemporary ethical issue.


Defend a coherent personal conviction about the best foundation for ethical conduct.


Competency 5: Communicate effectively in the context of personal and professional moral discourse.


Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for


professional communities. Competency Map


Check Your ProgressUse this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course. Context The three approaches to normative theory?virtue ethics, deontological ethics, and teleological ethics?


have unique advantages and disadvantages.


Virtue ethics has some obvious benefits. By emphasizing character traits instead of particular actions,


this approach encourages us to see ourselves as making progress toward the goal of becoming better,


even if we occasionally make mistakes. In this view, it is easy to see how moral education contributes


to the development of virtue, by promoting the formation of good habits of thinking and acting. Above


all, virtue ethics makes it plain that respect for ourselves and for each other is at the very heart of


ethical thought.


But there are some difficulties, too. It is not always clear how the commitment to virtue guides conduct


in particular circumstances. How, exactly, does who you are entail what you should do? More seriously,


if you aim at your own happiness, it might be easy to let that devolve into an egoistic pursuit of your


selfish interests, which is bound to clash with other people's virtuous goals for themselves. The success


of this approach to ethical theory depends upon our ability to resolve problems of this sort. 1/5 11/10/2016 Assessment 2 ? PHI?FP2000 ? Summer 2016 ? Section 02 Deontological ethics claims to provide perfect certainty about what we should do in every circumstance


?there is nothing to calculate or predict? we just do what the rules prescribe. It relieves us of any


responsibility for the results of our actions, since those outcomes are not relevant to the moral worth of


what we do. Deontologists usually hold that we have a right to demand that other people live up to their


duties with respect to us.


The nice thing about consequentialism is that it keeps us focused on the fact that what we do really


does have consequences for the world as a whole. Since those outcomes can be recognized by


everyone, this kind of theory promises to provide a public basis upon which to assess ethical action


objectively. In addition, this theory offers some flexibility in making decisions with an eye toward how


our actions will turn out in the long run.


There are problems, too, of course. Because we cannot simply fall back on formal rules here, the


consequentialist approach demands that we calculate the likely effects of our actions with great care.


This is not an easy task, since we sometimes cannot predict with any confidence exactly what outcomes


will be produced by our actions. In fact, since we do not know for sure what is going to happen, this


theory seems to imply that we will not know whether or not we did the right thing until later on, when


all of the relevant information has come in.


But these features give rise to corresponding difficulties with the deontological approach. Such theories


have trouble explaining what we should do about conflicting duties, cases in which our rules do not


agree with each other. Nor does this view make it easy to allow for the possibility that some actions are


more wrong than others. Most crucially, by ignoring the results of our actions, deontology implies that


our actions in obedience to the rules may sometimes have disastrous consequences.


In sum:


Virtue ethics gives full voice to our intuition that personal growth toward greater moral perfection is a vital aim


in life. The choices we make and the actions we perform contribute to who we are.


Deontological ethics seems rather rigid in its adherence to strict moral rules, but it nicely captures our sense


that what is simply right is right for everyone.


Although the practical value of a teleological approach can generate questions, we often rely upon utilitarian


considerations as we debate matters of public policy. Questions to Consider To deepen your understanding, you are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them


with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of the business community.


How do you understand the questions of relativism, a neutral moral understanding, or the imposition of basic


and universal human rights for all people? Why do many philosophers believe that there should be some basic


rights for all people? And what right would you impose by force, if necessary, to the rest of the world?


People who advocate virtue ethics often draw a distinction between what it means to be a virtuous human


being and what it means to be virtuous within one of the many roles that we play in our lives (such as parents,


employees, employers, soldiers, or politicians). What kinds of virtues and character traits do you believe that all


humans should have? What character traits should a politician or a businessperson have, in order to be a


virtuous politician or businessperson? Resources Suggested Resources 2/5 11/10/2016 Assessment 2 ? PHI?FP2000 ? Summer 2016 ? Section 02 The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide


a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental


Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom. Capella Multimedia


Click the links provided below to view the following multimedia pieces:


Relativism and Virtue. Library Resources


The following e?books or articles from the Capella University Library are linked directly in this course:


Aristotle, & Henry?Lewes, G. (1890). The ethics of Aristotle: With introductory essay by George Henry Lewes


(the Nicomachean ethics) (D. P. Chase, Trans.). London, GBR: Walter Scott Publishing Company.


Brabeck, M. M. (Ed.). (2000). Practicing feminist ethics in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological




May, H. (2010). Aristotle's ethics. London, GBR: Continuum International.


Stephens, W. O. (2007). Stoic ethics. London, GBR: Continuum International.


Epictetus. (1996). The enchiridion, or manual (J. Fieser, Ed., & E. Carter, Trans.). South Bend, IN:


Infoomotions, Inc.


Babcock, W. S. (1988). Focus on Augustine's ethics: Introduction. Journal of Religious Ethics, 16(1), 3?9.


Callahan, J. C. (1995). Reproduction, ethics and the law: Feminist perspectives. Bloomington, IN: Indiana


University Press. Course Library Guide


A Capella University library guide has been created specifically for your use in this course. You are


encouraged to refer to the resources in the PHI?FP2000 ? Ethics Library Guide to help direct your


research. Internet Resources


Access the following resources by clicking the links provided. Please note that URLs change frequently.


Permissions for the following links have been either granted or deemed appropriate for educational use


at the time of course publication.


Kemerling, G. (2011). Aristotle: Ethics and the virtues. The Philosophy Pages. Retrieved from


Kemerling, G. (2011). Hellenistic philosophy. The Philosophy Pages. Retrieved from


Kemerling, G. (2011). Medieval philosophy. The Philosophy Pages. Retrieved from


Gowans, C. (2008, December 9). Moral relativism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from


Hursthouse, R. (2012, March 8). Virtue ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from


Kraut, R. (2014, April 21). Aristotle's ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from


Graver, M. (2013, February 19). Epictetus. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from


Tong, R. (2009, May 4). Feminist ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved




Ethics Updates. (2012, February 18). Aristotle and virtue ethics. Retrieved from


Ethics Updates. (2010, November 2). Gender and ethical theory. Retrieved from Bookstore Resources 3/5 11/10/2016 Assessment 2 ? PHI?FP2000 ? Summer 2016 ? Section 02 Bookstore Resources


The resources listed below are relevant to the topics and assessments in this course and are not


required. Unless noted otherwise, these materials are available for purchase from the Capella


University Bookstore. When searching the bookstore, be sure to look for the Course ID with the specific


?FP (FlexPath) course designation.


Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2012). The elements of moral philosophy (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw?Hill.


Chapter 2, "The Challenge of Cultural Relativism."


Chapter 3, "Subjectivism in Ethics."


Chapter 12, "Feminism and the Ethics of Care."


Chapter 13, "The Ethics of Virtue." Assessment Instructions


For this assessment, you will invent a practical circumstance of your own choosing that illuminates


differences among the three approaches to normative theory? a circumstance in which the duties,


consequences, and virtues do not align with each other. It does not need to be a grand, controversial social


issue? an everyday moral dilemma will make the conflict clearer. Just look for an example where doing your


duty might cause lasting harm, or where caring about people requires breaking the rules.


Write a paper addressing this topic, supporting your statements with credible research on the three


approaches to normative theory. You may begin your research with the Suggested Resources for this unit,


but you are also expected to conduct your own independent research into the scholarly and professional


resources of the field.


Begin by describing a concrete situation that calls for someone to make an ethical decision about what to do.


Choosing your example carefully will make it easier to draw an interesting contrast between the theoretical


applications. Be sure to describe the situation with enough detail to provide adequate information for arriving


at a responsible choice. You are welcome to choose a case in which you are personally involved, but you


may find it easier to think objectively with a little detachment.


Next, think about the kinds of normative theory that could be applied to the situation you have chosen. If we


are not to surrender to ethical relativism, what should guide our decision here?duties, outcomes, or virtue?


You should select the approaches in a way that heightens the dilemma of deciding on a course of action that


would be right or wrong. Support your presentation by considering alternative ways of applying each theory


to the case. Use your example to compare and contrast the theoretical approaches in practical terms.


Finally, discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these normative theories as methods for making moral


decisions in practical cases. Use what you have written about the application of each theory to your example


as evidence of the merits of each way of thinking about everyday choices. What makes the most sense, and


how would you decide yourself? State your own position on which normative theory works best, and defend


that position with clear arguments in its support. Additional Requirements


Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.


APA formatting: Include a title page and a references page, formatted according to APA (6th edition) style and




References: A typical paper will include support from a minimum of 3?5 references. You may use some of the


materials recommended in the Resources, but you should also include support from your independent research of


scholarly or professional materials.


Length: A typical paper will be 4?6 typed, double?spaced pages in length.


Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12?point. Making a Moral Decision Scoring Guide


View Scoring Guide Use the scoring guide to enhance your learning. How to use the scoring guide 4/5 11/10/2016 Assessment 2 ? PHI?FP2000 ? Summer 2016 ? Section 02 [U02a1] Making A Moral Decision <Link Type="Text/Css" Media="Screen" Rel="Stylesheet" Href=




Write 4?6 pages in which you invent a practical circumstance that illuminates differences between the three


approaches to normative theory. Assessment Submit


Submit Assessment


This button will take you to the next available assessment attempt tab, where you will be able to submit your


assessment. U02a1: Making A Moral Decision


>> View/Complete U02a1: Making A Moral Decision: Revision 1


>> View/Complete U02a1: Making A Moral Decision: Revision 2


>> View/Complete 5/5


Solution details:

This question was answered on: Sep 18, 2020

PRICE: $15 (25.37 KB)

Buy this answer for only: $15

This attachment is locked

We have a ready expert answer for this paper which you can use for in-depth understanding, research editing or paraphrasing. You can buy it or order for a fresh, original and plagiarism-free copy from our tutoring website (Deadline assured. Flexible pricing. TurnItIn Report provided)

Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card . All your purchases are securely protected by .

About this Question






Sep 18, 2020





We have top-notch tutors who can do your essay/homework for you at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments.

You can also use these solutions:

  • As a reference for in-depth understanding of the subject.
  • As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced)
  • For editing and paraphrasing (check your institution's definition of plagiarism and recommended paraphrase).
This we believe is a better way of understanding a problem and makes use of the efficiency of time of the student.


Order New Solution. Quick Turnaround

Click on the button below in order to Order for a New, Original and High-Quality Essay Solutions. New orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.


Order Now