Question Details

[answered] A Critical Review of Man's Search for Meaning by Laura

write a reflection/analysis paper on the article "life and death"?(1000-1500)words.

(Man search for meaning is a sample article)

A Critical Review of Man?s Search for Meaning


by Laura Beres




In Man?s Search for Meaning, Viktor E. Frankl tells the very personal story of his


experience as a prisoner in a concentration camp during the Holocaust. He presents this story in


the form of an essay in which he shares his arguments and analysis as a doctor and psychologist


as well as a former prisoner. This paper will review Frankl?s story as well as his main


arguments, and will evaluate the quality of Frankl?s writing and focus on any areas of weakness


within the story.




This section contains a summary of Man's Search. Frankl begins his book by stating that


his purpose in writing the book is not to present facts and details of the Holocaust, but to provide


a personal account of the everyday life of a prisoner living in a concentration camp. He states,


?This tale is not concerned with the great horrors, which have already been described often


enough (though less often believed), but?it will try to answer this question: How was everyday


life in a concentration camp reflected in the mind of the average prisoner?? (21). Frankl then


goes on to describe the three stages of a prisoner?s psychological reactions to being held captive


in a concentration camp.


The first phase, which occurs just after the prisoner is admitted to the camp, is shock. The


second phase, occurring once the prisoner has fallen into a routine within the camp, is one of


apathy, or ?the blunting of the emotions and the feeling that one could not anymore? (42). The


third phase, which occurs after the prisoner has been liberated from the camp, is a period of


?depersonalization?, in which ?everything appears unreal, unlikely, as in a dream? (110). In this


phase, released prisoners also feel a sense of ?bitterness and disillusionment? when returning to


their former lives (113). Frankl describes each of these phases using psychological theory and


provides personal experiences to exemplify each of the stages.


Author?s Arguments


As described above, Frankl?s main purpose for writing this book is to present and analyze


the average prisoner?s psychological reactions to the everyday life of a concentration camp. His


three main arguments are his presentation and analysis of each of the psychological stages that


the average concentration camp prisoner experiences: shock, apathy and depersonalization. He


bases his analyses of each of these stages on the actions of the prisoners and his own personal


thoughts and reactions as he experienced life in a concentration camp.


For example, Frankl argues that the second phase of apathy forces ?the prisoner?s life


down to a primitive level? (47) in which ?all efforts and all emotions were centered on one task:


preserving one?s own life and that of the other fellow? (47). He bases this theory on events he


witnessed while living in the camp himself, and states, ?It was natural that the desire for food


was the major primitive instinct around which mental life centered. Let us observe the majority


of prisoners when they happened to work near each other and were, for once, not closely


watched. They would immediately start discussing food? (48). Frankl continuously uses examples from his experiences in the concentration camp to illustrate and strengthen his


psychological arguments throughout the text.




This section contains an evaluation of Frankl?s book. Firstly, the author is a survivor of


the Holocaust and was a prisoner of a concentration camp himself, which gives him the personal


insight to be able to comment on the psychological conditions of an average prisoner. However,


this also creates a bias and because of his personal experience, he is unable to be entirely


objective in writing his analysis. Frankl acknowledges this bias in the beginning of his book, by


stating, ?Only the man inside knows. His judgments may not be objective, his evaluations may


be out of proportion. This is inevitable. An attempt must be made to avoid any personal bias,


and that is the real difficulty of a book of this kind? (24-25). Although he is aware of this bias, it


creates a partiality that will sway the readers throughout his story and it serves as a minor


weakness in his writing style.


A second weakness in Frankl?s writing is in the assumptions he sometimes makes to


prove his point. He makes overarching generalizations several times in his book, making


statements that, although may have been true for himself and those around him, might not have


been true for every prisoner in every concentration camp during the Holocaust. For example, in


one instance, he says, ?The prisoner of Auschwitz , in the first phase of shock, did not fear death?


(37). It is very bold to say that no prisoner of Auschwitz, one of the most well-known and


deadly concentration camps of the Holocaust, did not fear death, as death was all around them


and was a very real threat in their daily lives. Although he might have not feared death during


his phase of shock, it is impossible for him to guarantee that no prisoner was at all fearful of


death in this first psychological phase, and for him to make overarching assumptions like this is a


weakness to the overall quality of his book.


Finally, Frankl sometimes becomes too technical and verbose in his writing style, which


makes it very hard for the average reader to understand. One example of this is as follows.


Frankl states, ?I remember an incident when there was an occasion for psychotherapeutic work


on the inmates of a whole hut, due to an intensification of their receptiveness because of a certain


external situation? (102). This sentence, which is overly wordy and complicated, makes it


difficult for the average reader to understand exactly what he is saying. A reader can easily get


frustrated when trying to decipher the author?s meaning due to overly complicated language, and


this is a third weakness of Frankl?s writing.




This critical review has evaluated the book Man?s Search for Meaning by Viktor E.


Frankl. The psychological theories that Frankl presents are very interesting and he does a good


job of illustrating these theories with his own personal experiences. However, his writing is


weakened by the presence of bias, the overarching assumptions he occasionally makes, and his


sometimes overly technical and verbose language.


Solution details:

This question was answered on: Sep 18, 2020

PRICE: $15 (25.37 KB)

Buy this answer for only: $15

This attachment is locked

We have a ready expert answer for this paper which you can use for in-depth understanding, research editing or paraphrasing. You can buy it or order for a fresh, original and plagiarism-free copy from our tutoring website (Deadline assured. Flexible pricing. TurnItIn Report provided)

Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card . All your purchases are securely protected by .

About this Question






Sep 18, 2020





We have top-notch tutors who can do your essay/homework for you at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments.

You can also use these solutions:

  • As a reference for in-depth understanding of the subject.
  • As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced)
  • For editing and paraphrasing (check your institution's definition of plagiarism and recommended paraphrase).
This we believe is a better way of understanding a problem and makes use of the efficiency of time of the student.


Order New Solution. Quick Turnaround

Click on the button below in order to Order for a New, Original and High-Quality Essay Solutions. New orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.


Order Now