Question Details

[answered] Business Social IT (information Technology) - System&qu


This assignment was given in my Strategic Management of Information Technology course. Could anyone please help me with this??

Thank you

Business Social IT (information Technology) - System?




Select a business or organization real or fictitious, use the cases or your own creativity. Describe it (see


below) it can be highly technical or not, but it must use the basic business functions to some degree. At


the end of your description there should be a problem(s), dysfunction(s), error(s), in the business/social


system. I include social systems because now we have social media which operates as a business. From


this exercise, you will develop Part I ? Current System Narrative which repeats much of this, BUT focuses


on problem(s), dysfunction(s), error(s), in the business/social system. Recommendations for


improvement are NOT included in Part I.


A thorough management analysis (gap analysis) is required.




What (product-service),


Where (location, cloud, etc.),


Why (does it exist, what function-purpose does it serve?),


When (does it work, do what it says it does?),


Who (clients, customers, B2B, etc.), and


How (major business functions).


Describe your ?System? and use Churchman?s System?s Approach as a guideline as well (see below). At


this level, we are very general. Try to stay around 2-3 pages. You may or may not include IT dys-function? The minimal system


In The Systems Approach (1968) Churchman


outlines five basic considerations for thinking about the meaning of a


system (TSA 29-30): the total system objectives and, more specifically, the performance


measures of the whole system;


the system?s environment: the fixed constraints;


the resources of the system;


the components of the system, their activities, goals and measures of


performance; and,


the management of the system. These aspects can be readily identified in the above concept map, which


also shows key relationships between these aspects. What he doesn?t


mention is: (a) that the system?s purpose should serve a group of clients or


beneficiaries (but they are perhaps implied in the ?system objectives?); and


(b) that a plan may be designed to improve the working of the whole system


(but that is perhaps implied in the notion of ?resources?).


Improving systems


The whole point of thinking in systems is to model


real systems in such a way that they can be improved. The model itself is


also a system. It should in some way resemble the real system, but will


never be more than an approximation. In addition to the real system and the


model of the system there is also the inquiry system. The inquiry system


(perhaps ?learning model? would be a more appealing modern equivalent)


uses the same basic elements (?learning categories?) as the ones in the


system model, but this time they are used in a process of comprehending


reality, a process of ?unfolding?.


Unfolding the categories


?. can be done in many ways. In a general


way it is no more than using the categories as labels or concepts for


formulating questions, contemplating them (alone or as a team), and finding


answers that can help improve the system of interest. In The Systems


Approach and its Enemies (1979) Churchman suggests that ?one way to


unfold any of the categories is to try to ?. compare the ?is? with the


?ought?. The search for the ?is ? usually leads to a map? (SAE 81).


Examples are the benefit-cost map for the ?client? category to trace out


where the benefits and costs go, and influence maps for the ?decision


maker? or ?planner? categories. Churchman?s books on the systems


approach are full of ingenious questions to help in unfolding the categories.


Back to our concept map


The ?purpose? category could be unfolded by


asking what the real objectives of the system are, which may differ


considerably from the stated objectives. This is an important distinction,


since the purpose must be known to be able to asses the performance and thereby the improvement of the whole system: in fact, both, the


performance of the whole system and of the system components (or


programmes) must be justified in terms of the system purpose. So the key


unfolding question is whether they are. And in the case of the programmes


whether the resources devoted to them justify the resources put into their




Solution details:

This question was answered on: Sep 18, 2020

PRICE: $15 (25.37 KB)

Buy this answer for only: $15

This attachment is locked

We have a ready expert answer for this paper which you can use for in-depth understanding, research editing or paraphrasing. You can buy it or order for a fresh, original and plagiarism-free copy from our tutoring website (Deadline assured. Flexible pricing. TurnItIn Report provided)

Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card . All your purchases are securely protected by .

About this Question






Sep 18, 2020





We have top-notch tutors who can do your essay/homework for you at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments.

You can also use these solutions:

  • As a reference for in-depth understanding of the subject.
  • As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced)
  • For editing and paraphrasing (check your institution's definition of plagiarism and recommended paraphrase).
This we believe is a better way of understanding a problem and makes use of the efficiency of time of the student.


Order New Solution. Quick Turnaround

Click on the button below in order to Order for a New, Original and High-Quality Essay Solutions. New orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.


Order Now