Question Details

[answered] Managerial Economics Final Exam Study Guide Some Conceptual

File is attached, already has answers to them (page 2 and beyond) need to show work to see how to get answers (set up/get to answer). Thank you!

Managerial Economics


Final Exam Study Guide Some Conceptual Questions


1. Explain the prediction of the Bertrand duopoly model that both firms will price at marginal cost. How does


Cournot Duopoly differ? 2. Explain how first, second, and third degree price discrimination differ from the standard uniform pricing


problem of the monopolist. Give real world examples of both second and third degree price discrimination.


Explain why the examples accurately depict second and third degree price discrimination. 3. Briefly explain the logic behind backward induction, our approach to solving sequential (dynamic) games.


Use the difference between Cournot and Stackelberg duopoly as an example. 4. Briefly explain the difference in market structure between perfect competition, monopolistic competition,


oligopoly, duopoly, and monopoly, and explain why or why not we need to use game theory to understand


firms? decision-making. Some Perfect Competition and Monopoly Problems


1. (i) Suppose the market demand for your good is given by P=120-(1/5)Q. The cost function for each firm is


identical, and is given by c(q)=10+(1/10)q2. If all firms in this market have the same technology and are


price-takers, how many units should each firm produce if the market price for the firm?s product is $20?


Assuming the market clears, how many firms are in the market. If the market clears at P=20, with demand at 500 and each firm producing 100 units, there are 500/100=5


firms in the market. (ii) If there is only one firm in the market, what price should it charge and how many units should it sell to


maximize profits? Q=200, P=80 2. Suppose a monopolist having constant marginal cost equal to 1 sells to two consumers. Consumer 1


has an inverse demand given by 1 (1 ) = 3 ? 31 and Consumer 2 has an inverse demand of


2 (2 ) = 4 ? 42 . Resale between the two consumers is not allowed.


a) Assume the monopolist has to use uniform pricing. Calculate the monopolist?s profit maximizing


price and quantity. How much will each consumer consume at that price?


(Answer: = 31




14 = 17




24 1 = 11




42 2 = 25




56 = 289




336 b) Now assume the monopolist can engage in third degree price discrimination. Calculate the


monopolist?s profit maximizing prices and how much he will sell to each market.


1 3 43 (Answer: 13 = 2, 23 = 2.5, 13 = 3, 23 = 8, 3 = 48) c) Lastly, graphically show what the outcome will be if the monopolist can engage in first degree,


i.e. perfect, price discrimination. Identify the producer surplus, any consumer surplus, and any


deadweight welfare loss.


2 9 43 (Answer: CS=0, DWL=0, 11 = 3, 21 = 8, 1 = 1 = 24 ? draw a graph with all CS in


each market being expropriated by the producer) d) Graphically show the outcome in part (a) and the outcomes in part (b). Assuming there are no


fixed costs to production, compare the profits under each of the three different pricing schemes.


Which pricing scheme does the monopolist prefer and why?


(Answer: graphs should be straight-forward? we should have a ranking of 1 > 3 > , so


the monopolist prefers being able to engage in 1st degree, i.e. perfect, price discrimination) 1 3. A monopolist has a single production plant in California with a total cost function of () = 2 2 ,


where is total output. The good can be sold to two separate markets, those on the west coast and


those on the east coast. There is no resale between coasts. The inverse demand function for the east


coast is given by = 100 ? and the inverse demand function for the west coast is given by


1 = 80 ? 2 .


a) Calculate the monopolist?s profit maximizing prices if he can engage in third degree price




(Answer: Pe=76, Pw=66, Qe=24, Qw=28) b) Calculate the monopolist?s profits if he uses standard uniform pricing. How do these compare


with his profits under optimal third degree price discrimination that you solved in part (a)?


(Answer: profits under uniform pricing are 2253.33?. profits under 3rd degree are 2320) c) Suppose that we are back in the world of third degree price discrimination. The monopolist can


build a second plant in Massachusetts (i.e. an east coast plant) that is identical to the California


plant (i.e. west coast plant), and plans on producing output for each region at their respective


plant. If the cost of constructing the plant is $1200 should the monopolist build the second plant?


How much should the monopolist be willing to pay for the plant? Explain.


(Answer: Well, marginal costs are increasing in quantity, so intuitively producing at two plants might


be attractive. If we re-optimize our production levels and prices using two separate plants I get


profits of $3,266.66?. so your profits increase by $946.66? you would not expand if the fixed costs


of construction were more than that, so that is the most you are willing to pay and you will not


expand at a cost of $1200) 1


2 4. A monopolist with total cost function () = 10 + 2 sells to 10 identical consumers, each of


1 whom has demand function () = 10 ? 2 for the monopolist?s product.


a) Is this monopolist operating in the short run or the long run? Explain how you know.


(Answer: Short Run, and we know because there is a fixed component to the cost function, indicating


that there is some fixed input and, by definition, that we are in the short run.) b) Suppose the monopolist must charge a uniform price. Calculate the monopolist?s optimal price


and its profits.


(Answer: = 120




7 = 100




7 = 6,510


49 ? 132.86) c) Calculate any deadweight welfare loss associated with the monopoly in part (a) and depict it




(Answer: = 1,000


294 ? 3.40, just draw a standard monopoly diagram) d) Suppose the monopolist can now engage in second degree price discrimination. Calculate the


monopolist?s optimal two-part tariff and it?s total profit.


(Answer: 2 = 50




3 2 = 50




3 = 25




9 2 = 1,410


9 ? 156.67) Some Discounting Problems


1. Suppose you just graduated from UCR and have 2 offers. The first is a job offer at Jobs ?? US with a fixed


salary schedule which paid $40,000 this year and has a 2% pay raise every year. You will expect to hold


this position for 40 years and then retire. The second offer is acceptance to a 2 year master?s program


which will cost $20,000 a year. After you earn your master?s degree, you expect to earn $70,000/year for


the following 38 years, at which point you will retire. You can invest at 10%.


All salary payments are made at the end of the year while tuition is paid at the start of the year.


Compare the net present value of each option. Which should you take? = $$475,607 ?


= $524,864.14 2. Suppose you bought a 10-year bond when the interest rate was 5% per year. So, your bond would pay


$50 at the end of each of the 10 consecutive years and, after the tenth year, your $1000 is returned to


you. You just collected your seventh annual payment on the bond.


(a) Suppose that you decide to sell the bond now, assuming that the interest rate is still 5% and this


is expected to continue for the indefinite future. How much can you expect to sell the bond for?


(Answer: $1000)


(b) Suppose the interest rate has changed to 10%. Now how much can you expect to sell the bond




(Answer: $876.65) 3. Comparing Investment Options


Consider the following investment options:


Option 1: invest $100 now and get back $125 in one year


Option 2: invest $75 now and get back $100 in two years (a) Find the internal rate of return for both options.


(Answer: option 1, IRR is 25%. Option 2, IRR is 15.5%)


(b) If the interest rate is 5% which option would you prefer?


(Answer: NPV(option1)=$19.05, NPV(option2)=15.70) Some Game Theory Problems 1. Find all of the pure strategy Nash Equilibria of the following simultaneous move game. Solve it two


different ways: using IESDS and using the underlining method. When solving it with IESDS be sure to


clearly state the order of elimination of strategies and what your reasoning is. Column Row A B C D E a 9,4 12,10 15,7 2,8 15,5 b 14,8 3,10 12,18 4,7 20,12 c 7,8 6,8 20,10 3,12 15,9 d 15,0 7,4 14,2 5,3 9,1 e 20,18 2,9 10,14 3,7 19,20 (Answer: we should get (a,B) as the Nash Equilibrium) 2. Consider 2 firms selling fertilizer competing as Cournot duopolists. The inverse demand function


facing the fertilizer market is = 1 ? , where = + . For simplicity, assume that the longrun marginal cost for each firm is equal to ?, i.e. c(q)=?q for each firm. a) Find the Cournot Nash equilibrium where the firms choose output simultaneously.


(Answer: = = 1/4, = 1/2 b) Depict the outcome of (a) graphically with a diagram of the reaction functions. Identify the Nash


equilibrium, and clearly label your graph.


c) Find the Stackelberg Nash Equilibrium where firm A as the Stackelberg leader.


3 3 7 (Answer: = 8 , = 16, = 16) 3. Find all of the pure strategy Nash Equilibria of the following simultaneous move game. Solve it two


different ways: using IESDS and using the underlining method.






b L






2,0 M






2,12 R






3,0 (Answer: (m,L) and (t,R)) 4. Consider the following entry or exit game. Recall that, if X is a random variable as payouts are here,


then the expected value of X is just the sum of the possible outcomes where each is weighted by the


probability that it happens. Assume that for any pair of strategies for the new and old cleaner there is


a 70% chance the economy is normal and a 30% chance there is a recession. Payouts are in the


order (New Cleaner, Old Cleaner).


a) Solve for the Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium of this sequential game.


(Answer: (Enter, High Price))


b) Suppose the order of play is reversed, i.e. the Old Cleaner first sets a price, then the New Cleaner


makes an entrance decision, and then we learn if we are in a recession or not and what our


payoffs are. Solve for the Nash Equilibrium now. Can the Old Cleaner deter market entry in this


case? What about in the first case?


(Answer: (Low Price, Stay Out) ? yes the entrant can now be deterred if the old cleaner takes


pre-emptive action. In part (a) the threat to lower prices and start a price war was an incredible




Solution details:

This question was answered on: Sep 18, 2020

PRICE: $15 (25.37 KB)

Buy this answer for only: $15

This attachment is locked

We have a ready expert answer for this paper which you can use for in-depth understanding, research editing or paraphrasing. You can buy it or order for a fresh, original and plagiarism-free copy from our tutoring website (Deadline assured. Flexible pricing. TurnItIn Report provided)

Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card . All your purchases are securely protected by .

About this Question






Sep 18, 2020





We have top-notch tutors who can do your essay/homework for you at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments.

You can also use these solutions:

  • As a reference for in-depth understanding of the subject.
  • As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced)
  • For editing and paraphrasing (check your institution's definition of plagiarism and recommended paraphrase).
This we believe is a better way of understanding a problem and makes use of the efficiency of time of the student.


Order New Solution. Quick Turnaround

Click on the button below in order to Order for a New, Original and High-Quality Essay Solutions. New orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.


Order Now