Question Details

Answered: - Descartes gives a complicated proof for the existence of G

Descartes gives a complicated proof for the existence of God in Meditation III (see Slideshow for reconstruction of the argument). The importance of this proof is seen in Meditation VI, where Descartes uses the existence of God to prove what about our minds and bodies, and what about our knowledge of objects outside our minds?

Knowledge I


Plato and Descartes





!? Plato and Descartes aim at determining what the proper


method for arriving at knowledge is.



!? Both begin with the observation that we claim to ?know? a


lot of things. But what marks the differences between


opinions, true belief, and knowledge?



Plato?s Meno


!? The Meno begins not with the quetions





But with the question:





!? This is why many philosophers read Meno as a dialogue


not about ethics and virtue, but about knowledge.



Plato?s Meno


!? The problem of knowledge first appears mid-way


through the Meno:


Socrates (summarizing Meno?s claim): ?Do you not realize


what a debater?s argument you are bringing up, that [one]


cannot search either for what [one] knows or for what


[one] does not know? [One] cannot search for what [one]


knows?since [one] knows is, there is is need to search?


nor for what [one] does not know, for [one] does not


know what to look for.? (p. 70, 80e)



Plato?s Meno


!? Socrates: Perhaps we know by recollection


?As the soul is immortal . . .? (p. 71, 81c-d)



?These opinions have been stirred up like a


dream . . .? (p. 77, 85c-d)


!? Recollection: ?And he will know if without having been


taught but only questioned, and find the knowledge


within himself.? (p. 77, 85d)



Plato?s Meno


!? Supposing we have knowledge of something?


!? Either we acquired knowledge at some time or we have always


possessed knowledge.


!? If we have not acquired this knowledge in our present life, then


we acquired this knowledge at some other time.


!? Recall: Socrates takes it that the slave?s knowledge of


geometry was not acquired in his present life.


!? If the knowledge was acquired before this present life, then our


we acquired it before this life.


!? Therefore, (i) the soul is immortal; and (ii) knowledge is always


in our soul.



Descartes on Achieving




?Suppose [someone] had a basket


full of apples and, being worried


that some of the apples were


rotten, wanted to take out the


rotten ones to prevent the rot from


spreading. How would he proceed?


Would he not begin by tipping the


whole lot out of the basket? And


would not the next step be to cast


his eye over each apple in turn, and


pick up and put back in the basket


only those he saw to be sound,


leaving the others? (con?t)





In just the same way, those who have never philosophized


correctly have various opinions in their minds which they have


begun to store up since childhood, and which they therefore


have reason to believe may in many cases be false. They then


attempt to separate the false beliefs from the others, so as to


prevent their contaminating the rest and making the whole lot


uncertain. Now the best way they can accomplish this is to reject


all their beliefs together in one go, as if they were all uncertain


and false. They can then go over each belief in turn and re-adopt


only those which they recognize to be true and


indubitable? (Objections and Replies to the Meditations)



Meditation 1


!? Descartes? Method of Doubt


?I realized that it was necessary, once in the course of my life, to


demolish everything completely and start again right from the


foundations if I wanted to establish anything at all in the sciences


that was stable and likely to last. . . . I am here quite alone, and at


last will devote myself sincerely and without reservation to the


general demolition of my opinions.? (17)


?Reason now leads me to think that I should hold back my assent


from opinions which are not completely certain and indubitable


just as carefully as I do from those which are patently false. So, for


the purpose of rejecting all my opinions, it will be enough if I find


in each of them at least some reason for doubt.? (18)



Meditation 1


!? The Method of Doubt Applied in Three Waves





Doubting beliefs based on sense experience: ?[F]rom time to time I


have found that the senses deceive, and it is prudent never to trust


completely those who have deceived us once.? (18)






The dream argument: ?How often, asleep at night, am I convinced of


just such familiar events?that I am here in my dressing-gown, sitting


by the fire?when in fact I am laying undressed in bed! [?] As I


think about this more carefully, I see plainly that there are never any


sure signs by means of which being awake can be distinguished from


being asleep.? (19)






Evil genius hypothesis: ?I will suppose that . . . some malicious


demon [or genius] of the utmost cunning has employed all his


energies in order to deceive me.? (22)



Meditation 1


!? Conclusions:


!? I have reasons to doubt the beliefs formed on the basis of


sense experience are true.


!? I have a reason to doubt the laws of the natural sciences


and the rules of the applied sciences are true. (dream




!? I have a reason to doubt the abstract principles of science


and mathematics are true.



!? What?s left?



Meditation II


!? ?Therefore I suppose that everything I see is false. I believe that


none of what my deceitful memory represents ever existed. I


have no senses whatsoever. Body, shape, extension, movement,


and place are all chimeras. What then will be true? Perhaps just


the single fact that nothing is certain.? (24)



!? Question: Can the evil demon/genius deceive me even


regarding my own existence?



Meditation II


!? ?And let him do his best at deception; he will never bring it about


that I am nothing so long as I shall think that I am something.


Thus, after everything has been most carefully weighed, it must


finally be established that this pronouncement, ?I think, I exist? is


necessarily true every time I utter it or conceive it in my mind.?


!? Question: What kind of thing am I?


Descartes: ?Yet I am a true thing and am truly existing; but


what kind of thing? I am a thinking thing?But what then


am I? A thing that thinks. What is that? A thing that doubts,


understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, and that also imagines and


senses.? (28)



Meditation II


!? Recall: We have reason to doubt that we have a body (first


wave of doubt).


!? But we have no reason to doubt our existence as a thinking




?At present I am not admitting anything except what is


necessarily true, I am, then, in the strict sense only a thing


that thinks; that is, I am a mind, or intelligence, or intellect,


or reason ? words whose meaning I have been ignorant of


until now.? (27)



Meditation II


!? Question: Why draw the inference from ?I think? to ?I am


a thinking thing?? Might there only be thoughts?


!? Descartes response: No thoughts without a thinker


!? Substance vs. Mode


!? Substance: An independent thing


!? Mode: A modification of a substance


!? So: I (or the mind) am a substance; my thoughts are modes


of mind



Meditation II


!? After two meditations, I know:


(a) that I exist;


(b) that I am a mind (?thinking thing?);


(c) that I have thoughts (my thoughts exist)



!? But what else can I know?


!? Stay tuned for Meditations III and VI




Solution details:

This question was answered on: Sep 18, 2020

PRICE: $15 (25.37 KB)

Buy this answer for only: $15

This attachment is locked

We have a ready expert answer for this paper which you can use for in-depth understanding, research editing or paraphrasing. You can buy it or order for a fresh, original and plagiarism-free copy from our tutoring website (Deadline assured. Flexible pricing. TurnItIn Report provided)

Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card . All your purchases are securely protected by .

About this Question






Sep 18, 2020





We have top-notch tutors who can do your essay/homework for you at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments.

You can also use these solutions:

  • As a reference for in-depth understanding of the subject.
  • As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced)
  • For editing and paraphrasing (check your institution's definition of plagiarism and recommended paraphrase).
This we believe is a better way of understanding a problem and makes use of the efficiency of time of the student.


Order New Solution. Quick Turnaround

Click on the button below in order to Order for a New, Original and High-Quality Essay Solutions. New orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.


Order Now