Does Social Media enhance interpersonal relationshipsExplain the topic you are addressing and your position on it. Provide a preview of your paper and a statement of your thesis in your opening paragraph. [Approximately 100 words] Present your main argument for your thesis in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line. Clearly indicate whether your argument is intended to be inductive or deductive. Follow up the presentation of your argument by clarifying the meaning of any premises that could use some explanation. [About 150 words]
- If your argument is deductive, then it should be valid (in the strict logical sense of the word); if it is inductive, then it should be strong. Make sure to avoid committing logical fallacies within your argument (e.g., begging the question). Additionally, the premises should be true, to the best of your knowledge. If one of your premises has a pretty obvious counter-example, then you should either fix the argument so that it does not have this flaw, or later, in your paper (steps three through five) you should address the apparent counter-example (showing that it does not really refute the truth of your premise). Arguments that are not valid, not very strong, commit fallacies, or that have counter-examples that are not adequately addressed will not receive full credit.
- Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments (arguments whose conclusions are premises of the main argument), or other ways of demonstrating the truth of those premises. This section should include at least one scholarly research source.
- Study what people on the other side of this question think about your reasoning and present the best possible objection that someone could have to your argument. Do not commit the straw man fallacy here. Reference at least one scholarlyresearch source. See the ?Practicing Effective Criticism? section of Chapter 9 of the course text for more information.
- Once you have presented the objection, indicate clearly how you might respond to it. It is acceptable to admit that reasonable people might disagree with you or that there might be an area in which your argument could be further strengthened, but you should do your best to explain why your argument is sound or cogent despite the objections.
Rogerian Argument about Facebook
Social networking sites (SNS) are a rapidly growing segment of social interaction all over
the world. (McCafferty 19)They serve as a source of information for individuals and groups as
well as a source of relative connectivity between individuals who know one another in the real
world and to allow connections between people who share common interests but might not know
one another outside a SNS. (Houghton & Joinson 75) The interconnectivity of the sites, in this
paper the focus will be on Facebook the most popular of the SNS service, can serve as a
foundational support network for information and to build and or maintain social connections,
yet it also has the potential to leave individuals vulnerable to fraudulent and bad behaviors by
others as well as a public arena for the exposition of one?s own bad behaviors. Some people
claim that the potential for connectivity, and especially international connectivity issues
associated with a global world view, mandate the support of the broader community for SNS
sites and activities. (McCafferty) Conversely others argue that the potential for violations of
privacy and inappropriate (or illegal) activities make SNS an insurmountable threat to
individuals that should be tightly controlled if not stopped all together. (Kugler) (Haughton &
Joinson) (Chaulk & Jones)
The reality is that with the advent of almost any new technology there are both positive
and negative possible outcomes, and in the case of social networking sites the potential of each
can be exponential. Therefore Facebook should have high levels of easy to use choice on the part
of the consumer, as to what he or she is willing to share and with who and should also have a low
level of tolerance for illegal and bad behavior on the part of users all while protecting this
Student Last Name 2
functional and useful new social tool. (McCafferty) (Kayri1 & ?ak?r) (Kodrich &Laituri)
(Carroll & Landry)
Argument in Favor of Greater Controls or Elimination of Facebook
Facebook can and often does create conflict in interpersonal relationships through
inappropriate behaviors of its users. The kind of conflict it generates can be associated with
information sharing that is beyond acceptable to ?all? of one?s connections and therefore
offensive or even incriminating to self or others. Something that might seem benign to one
person might turn out to be highly offensive, invasive or incriminating to others. (Chaulk &
Jones 246) The resulting circumstances can be surprising and emotionally stressful for some
involved. (Houghton & Joinson 82) In some recent examples the shaming of an individual for
public actions that were seen as offensive by some created reportedly sever reactions in those
involved, while others were sanctioned with job loss as a result of online posts on his or her SNS
page. (Houghton & Joinson 77)
These situations and others bring to mind a need to carefully control the venue of the
SNS, so that individuals are in the least aware of the possibility of connectivity associated with
posting and or the posting activities of others. This is also to say nothing of the two other
important issues that can be seen in SNS activity, cyber-bullying or stalking and fraudulent
economic scams. (Chaulk & Jones) (Kugler) Lastly there is also a valid argument that has been
present prior to Facebook where psychologists and others fear harm to introverted individuals
because the venue allows them to avoid real life social contact. (Ryan & Xenos) The kind of
connectivity that feeds such offensive results is made possible only by the very existence of
Student Last Name 3
Facebook and other SNS sites, which create at least the illusion of anonymity and protection by
distance for the knowing offender but also demonstrate fertile ground for self-incrimination by
sharing of information that others might see as a violation of privacy. The arguments that support
the dismantling or the mandating of severe legal and therefore (physical) restrictions are
supported by the fact that these events occur and occur often, some with relatively minor results
and others with rare but disastrous results.
Privacy violations, though they are subjective likely occur every second though the
majority is relatively minor, no more common than in real life social interactions but multiplied
by thousands and millions based on the connectivity of so many people many of whom have
access to Facebook 24-7. In other words because individuals cannot interact with 130 (the
average number of Facebook user friends) known people in the physical world in any given day
the odds of offense or even real or perceived harm increase exponentially in both directions.
(Houghton & Joinson 75) In this context the validity of stricter controls and even the elimination
of some more unsecure features or even the site itself seem plausible as like many other forms of
technology the potential for human harm is great. (Strand 11) (Ryan & Xenos) Additionally, the
standard idea that the consumer is ultimately responsible for self protection seems to be lacking
in this instance as so much becomes out of control in a web of infinite connectivity.
Argument in Favor of Protection or Even Expansion of Facebook
The converse argument also holds water as it is very clear that the potential for human
social gain is as great if not greater than the potential for harm and therefore should be protected,
without concern for the potential for harm. Human beings all over the world can connect in real
time, as events occur and make a real positive difference to one another. Some examples in the
Student Last Name 4
literature include the incomparable activity associated with recent natural disasters, such as was
seen in the Haiti earthquake. Individuals and groups had access to rapid information about the
disaster, the human toll and the needs of the people and other more fortunate individuals even
responded with an unprecedented amount of aid revolving around Facebook and other SNS sites.
(Kodrich & Laituri 626)
There is a clear sense that in many instances the opportunity to connect to cultural ideas
and ideals different from one?s own is also potentially promising in ways in which it has never
been before. Prior to the internet and the connectivity of Facebook there has been only a limited
opportunity for cultural interaction as travel is usually relegated to the elite, many locations and
cultures are hard to reach and language barriers are frustrating, so what was left for most was the
ability to view still shots in newspapers and magazines and read or listen to the interpretations of
Consider these numbers: Facebook is poised to hit 700 million users and, as seven of 10
Facebook members reside outside the U.S., more than 70 global-language translations. ?
In terms of daily usage, Facebook generates the second-most traffic of any site in the
Though some would argue that the manner in which users use Facebook does not always lend
itself to global social interaction, i.e. that individuals usually only interact directly with those
they know in real life or on topical levels with those they do not, this does not negate the context
of the possibility for enormous social and cultural sharing. (Ryan & Xenos 1660) (McCafferty)
(Kodrich & Laituri) These interactions which can be viewed as either positive or negative
demonstrate a potential for cultural sharing that should not be curtailed despite the opportunity
Student Last Name 5
for fraud and or any other potential harm from exposure. In this context is also the point where
the culture in which we live has become increasingly mobile in the last 100 years and therefore it
is much more common for individuals and origin families to be living very far from their place
of birth and therefore their origin culture and family.
This may leave some people lonely for the familiar and in serious need for a
communication tool that in the very least makes people they have known in other places
accessible at any time. There is a clear sense that this type of assurance is enough to calm the
loneliness of a new place, and especially for children and teens. (Chaulk & Landry 245) (Kayri
& ?ak?r) The potential for harm for most is nearly completely negated by the potential for good
that is offered by Facebook and other SNS sites and applications.
The common ground that exists between these two seemingly opposing views is actually
rather significant as each would like to see the positive outweigh the negative in as many ways as
possible. Each would like to see the individual protected and at least some credence given to the
ways in which individuals and Facebook itself can mitigate harm through user options,
awareness and site controls. The resulting protections would ultimately create an environment
that would meet the needs of both views by ultimately protecting the user and creating a situation
that would enhance rather than demean human social interaction. Though the latter view would
like to see fewer controls and the former view would like to see far more the ultimate and ideal
would be a format that allowed sharing in such a way that individual harm was severely
mitigated and individual gain was ultimately prosperous.
Student Last Name 6
Such protections could be woven into the usability of Facebook in such a way that users
could easily find the information they needed to protect themselves and their children from bad
or illegal behavior and from sharing that is inappropriate in one way or the other without relying
solely on the consumer to beware the pitfalls of sharing their information. Facebook could
monitor the system in such a way that lesser damage is done and also actively pursue violators of
cyber illegality. On a more general note many of the controls and laws associated with new
internet technologies have yet to be developed as such technologies are so new and the level to
which the law and government should or can interfere or control social media is a grey area that
will likely become more and more illuminated in the next 10-20 years. The desire of course is to
have a completely safe environment for users but freedoms such as freedom of speech and
freedom of association curtail most invasively serious mandated controls. It is for this reason and
others that the two seemingly opposing views can and should come together to help create a
system that is safer than it has been in the past and protects consumers in unseen ways from the
potential for harm.
This is not to say that the whole of the Facebook system should line by line censor what
individuals post and that consumer education is not a key aspect of this common ground. In other
words individuals need to be counseled that they should not post anything they would not want a
criminal or their grandmother to read. Additionally the expansion of positive opportunities for
cultural exchange should be supported and even advanced within the confines of fair exchange
and positive social networking and even opportunities for education. (Kayri & ?ak?r) The whole
world is literally at our fingertips and we can choose to control it in such a way that our efforts
mitigate harm to others.
Student Last Name 7
The opposing sides can come together on the primary point of each, that human harm
should be reduced and human opportunity should be expanded. The potential for human cultural
and social interaction is so great with regard to Facebook and other SNS that the common ground
should be recognized as a valid position that ultimately demonstrates greater protection while
expanding and protecting the possibility for greater human interaction that is present in
The potential for harm associated with Facebook often revolves around the idea that
conflict is inherently bad, regardless of the fact that such conflict often creates opportunities for
learning in an environment that is wholly new and infinitely malleable. This can be true to a
large degree for both younger and older users of the Facebook application. All users but
especially younger users should be cautioned about the misuse of the tool but the tool itself
should also bend people in the direction of safety, allowing controls and user preferences clear
access and easily understandable ways to protect themselves and their information. A policy
change is definitely in order, regarding the utilization of controls and even possibly tutorials that
aide in reassessing privacy controls and allow users to rapidly and easily change settings and
affiliations to protect themselves prior to events of possible harm. This should certainly include
age controls where certain settings and or information variables are not even accessible by those
in certain age groups and where individuals are made to clearly understand that regardless of
how protected they believe they are, just as has always been true everything one posts online
should be considered by that individual as public information, therefore if one does not want
anyone or even a chosen few to know the information then he or she should simply not post it.
Individuals must also be made aware that to some degree their information is timeless, in that
Student Last Name 8
information long outdated can still be present in some form online and again take credence to
control what they say and post.
Student Last Name 9
Carroll, Brian, and Katie Landry. "Logging On And Letting Out: Using Online Social Networks
To Grieve And To Mourn." Bulletin Of Science, Technology & Society 30.5 (2010): 341349. Academic Search Premier. Web. 8 Nov. 2011. http://0search.ebscohost.com.library.pcc.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=53744338&
Chaulk, Kasey, and Tim Jones. "Online Obsessive Relational Intrusion: Further Concerns About
Facebook." Journal Of Family Violence 26.4 (2011): 245-254. Academic Search Premier.
Web. 8 Nov. 2011. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.library.pcc.edu/login.aspx?
Houghton, David J. and Adam N. Joinson. ?Privacy, Social Network Sites, and Social Relations?
Journal of Technology in Human Services 28. 1-2 (2010) 74-94. doi:
Kayri, Murat and ?zlem ?ak?r ?An Applied Study om Educational Use of Facebook as a Web
2.0 Tool: the Sample Lesson of Computer Networks and Communication.? International
Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology 2.4 (August 2010): 48-58 doi :
Khodrich, Kris and Melinda Laituri ?Making a Connection: Social Media?s Key Role in the
Coverage of the Haiti Earthquake and in the Relief Efforts? Journal of Communication
and Computer 8 (2011) 624-627
Kugler, Logan. "Spot And Avoid Facebook Scams." PC World 29.8 (2011): 35-36. Academic
Search Premier. Web. 8 Nov. 2011. http://0-
Student Last Name 10
McCafferty, Dennis. "Brave, New Social World." Communications Of The ACM 54.7 (2011): 1921. Academic Search Premier. Web. 8 Nov. 2011. doi :10.1145/1965724.1965732
Tracii Ryan and Sophia Xenos. ?Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship
between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage?
Computers in Human Behavior (08 March 2011) doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.004
Strand, John L. "Facebook: Trademarks, Fan Pages, And Community Pages." Intellectual
Property & Technology Law Journal 23.1 (2011): 10-13. Business Source Premier. Web.
8 Nov. 2011. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.library.pcc.edu/login.aspx?
This question was answered on: Sep 18, 2020
Buy this answer for only: $15
This attachment is locked
We have a ready expert answer for this paper which you can use for in-depth understanding, research editing or paraphrasing. You can buy it or order for a fresh, original and plagiarism-free copy from our tutoring website www.aceyourhomework.com (Deadline assured. Flexible pricing. TurnItIn Report provided)
Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card . All your purchases are securely protected by .
About this QuestionSTATUS
Sep 18, 2020EXPERT
GET INSTANT HELP/h4>
We have top-notch tutors who can do your essay/homework for you at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments.
You can also use these solutions:
- As a reference for in-depth understanding of the subject.
- As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced)
- For editing and paraphrasing (check your institution's definition of plagiarism and recommended paraphrase).
NEW ASSIGNMENT HELP?
Order New Solution. Quick Turnaround
Click on the button below in order to Order for a New, Original and High-Quality Essay Solutions. New orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.
WE GUARANTEE, THAT YOUR PAPER WILL BE WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH AND WITHIN YOUR SET DEADLINE.